'Books that are needlessly large, need- lessly wide and needlessly heavy. Books have to be handy. Books wider than the ratio 3:4 (quarto), especially square ones, are ugly and impractical; the most important good proportions for books were and are 2:3, Golden Section and 3:4. The hybrid format A5 is particularly bad, while the hybrid format A4 is at times not entirely unsuitable. The inner book, or book block, of books that are too wide - square books in particular - will drop at the face. It is not easy to shelve or otherwise store books that are wider than 25 cm; 97/8 in.'
In order to visualise Tschichol's proposition, I drew out some publications using the ratios:
The 2:3 and 3:4 ratio because are portrait profile which makes storage easier than a long landscape publication. The 2:3 ratio is typical for publications that are text based because of its narrow structure.
The 3:4 ratio is slightly wider which will accommodate large images. The extended width also gives the publication more presence which is desired for a coffee table book.
Sagmeister's 'Things I Have Learned' publication is precisely 18x24 cm:
After creating a mock up of the 18x24cm publication, it became apparent that I could go much larger so that the publication has more presence. I still aim to make the pages smaller than A4 so that I can print each double page on an A3 sheet which is more cost effective.
21x27cm
Contradicted my research into Tschichold by not using the ratios provided, instead I made the publication slightly wider to accomodate the large images so that they are clear and take advantage of the white space.
No comments:
Post a Comment